Baghdad, Iraq- The Coordination Framework (CF), has expressed its full support for the Federal Supreme Court’s decision to suspend the implementation of three controversial laws. The CF argues that this ruling is essential for preserving the constitutional integrity of the country.
In a statement, the CF clarified that the court’s intervention was necessary due to “clear and dangerous procedural violations” that took place during the January 21 parliamentary session, which led to the passing of the General Amnesty Law, Personal Status Law, and Property Restitution Law. The coalition contended that these laws were enacted hastily, without sufficient debate, and under questionable quorum conditions, violating legal and parliamentary norms.
The CF emphasized that the court’s decision to suspend the laws was not an attack on legislative authority, but rather a defense of constitutional order. “This is a temporary measure to allow the judiciary to assess the legality of these actions before irreversible steps are taken,” the statement read. The CF further clarified that such procedures are standard in constitutional democracies to ensure that laws comply with established legal frameworks.
Rejecting accusations that the ruling was politically motivated, the CF warned against efforts to undermine the judiciary and frame the court’s decision as a partisan maneuver. The coalition stressed that the ruling was not targeting any political faction but was a necessary correction of a flawed parliamentary process.
The CF urged all political groups to resolve differences within constitutional channels and avoid attempts to incite public opinion against judicial institutions, which could deepen political instability. “This issue is not a political dispute between parties; it’s about upholding the legitimacy of our institutions,” the statement concluded. “The court is fulfilling its constitutional duty, and all must respect its role in preserving Iraq’s democratic process.”
On Tuesday, the Federal Supreme Court temporarily froze the implementation of amendments to the three controversial laws pending a final constitutional ruling. The decision has faced significant opposition from Sunni political factions, including Al-Siyada, Taqadum, and the Iraqi National Project, who criticized the judiciary’s stance, accusing it of political bias and obstructing critical reforms.
In protest of the court’s decision, officials in Nineveh, Al-Anbar, and Saladin declared a suspension of official working hours on Wednesday.
